https://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/issue/feedJournal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00Arief Maulanatechcartpress@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<p align="justify"><strong>Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS)</strong> is a peer-review journal focusing on Information Technology, Software Engineering, and Computer Science issues. <strong>Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS)</strong> invites academics and researchers who do original research in information technology, software engineering, and computer science.<strong> Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS) are published by</strong> <strong>Tech Cart Press</strong> in <strong>January</strong>, <strong>April</strong>, <strong>July</strong>, and <strong>October</strong> every year. Journal ITSECS: Information Technology, Software Engineering, and Computer Science accept articles in Bahasa Indonesia and English.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS)</strong> has ISSN <a title="ISSN Online" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/20221219192305315" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2962-0635 (Online)</a> in accordance with the letter of Statement Number 29620635/II.7.4/SK.ISSN/12/2022, and ISSN <a title="P-ISSN" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/20221220300812059" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2962-0538 (Print)</a> in accordance with the letter of Statement Number 29620538/II.7.4/SK.ISSN/12/2022.</p>https://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/article/view/158Combination of SMART and CRITIC Methods in Decision Support Systems for Determination of Superior Products2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00Rakhmat Dedi Gunawanrakhmatdedig@teknokrat.ac.id<p>Superior products are goods or services that have a higher value compared to other similar products because of their quality, innovation, or uniqueness. These products are usually produced through a standardized production process, utilizing selected raw materials, and supported by modern technology and special skills. The determination of superior products is carried out through a comprehensive analysis process to identify goods or services that have great potential to provide added value, both economically and socially. The main problem in determining superior products often arises due to the lack of accurate and comprehensive data on market potential, product quality, and consumer needs. Inaccuracies in setting evaluation criteria or weights given to each criterion can also result in bias in the selection process. This research aims to implement a combination of SMART and CRITIC methods in a decision support system to determine superior products objectively and efficiently. This combination is designed to take advantage of the advantages of the SMART method in evaluating alternatives based on multi-criteria utility, as well as the CRITIC method in determining the weight of the criteria objectively based on data variation and correlation between criteria. The results of the ranking of seven products are based on the total value that has been calculated using a certain evaluation method. Product G (D700) ranks first with the highest score of 0.78961, showing the best performance compared to other alternatives. These results provide clear information about which products are superior and can be the basis for decision-making in choosing the best product.</p>2024-10-15T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Rakhmat Dedi Gunawanhttps://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/article/view/160Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penilaian Staff Divisi Purchasing Menggunakan Metode SAW dan ROC2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00Syarif Hidayatullahsyarif.hidayatullah@unpak.ac.idHeri Bambang Santosoheri.bambang@unpak.ac.id<p>Purchasing Division Staff is an individual who is responsible for managing the procurement process of goods or services needed by the organization. They have a crucial role in ensuring the availability of materials or services of the highest quality, competitive prices, and delivery times that suit operational needs. Their main duties include analyzing needs, finding and evaluating suppliers, negotiating contracts, and monitoring supplier compliance with agreed agreements. The combination of the SAW and ROC methods creates an effective approach in multi-criteria decision support systems, by integrating the strengths of both methods. The advantage of this combination is the integration of ROC which ensures the weighting of criteria is based on the order of importance systematically, while SAW simplifies the process of calculating the final score. The ranking results obtained by TF Staff ranked the highest with a score of 0.8736, showing the most superior performance among all purchasing staff. The second position was occupied by AE Staff with a score of 0.8568, who also had a very good performance although slightly lower than TF Staff. DP staff is in third place with a score of 0.8086, still in the strong and competitive performance category. These results provide an objective picture of the order of purchasing staff performance based on the criteria that have been evaluated.</p>2024-10-15T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Syarif Hidayatullah, Heri Bambang Santosohttps://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/article/view/161Penerapan Metode G-MAUT Dalam Pemilihan Editor Video Terbaik2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00Ade Dwi Putraadedwiputra@teknokrat.ac.idM. Ghufroni An’arsm.ghufroni_anars@teknokrat.ac.id<p>A video editor is a professional who is responsible for processing raw footage into videos that are interesting, structured, and in accordance with the project's objectives. Choosing the best video editor requires careful consideration to evaluate their mastery of popular editing software, as well as additional capabilities such as color correction, audio processing, and visual effects. The main problem in choosing the best video editor often has to do with the difficulty of objectively assessing quality and ability before working together. Problems in the best video editor rating often arise due to the subjective nature of the work and depend on aesthetic preferences as well as the specific needs of the project. This study aims to apply the G-MAUT method in the process of selecting the best video editor. The main goal is to produce an objective, systematic, and multi-criteria-based assessment system to help make more accurate decisions. By using the G-MAUT method, this research can provide solutions that can improve efficiency and fairness in the election process, as well as contribute to the development of decision support systems in the creative field. The results of the calculation using the G-MAUT method in the ranking of the best video editor selection were obtained by Candidate C managed to rank first with the highest final score, which was 0.7794, showing superior performance compared to other candidates. In second place, there is Candidate A with a score of 0.4241, which still shows a significant contribution even though it is quite far from the first place. Candidate D followed in third place with a score of 0.3573. These results illustrate the stark differences among the candidates, providing important insights for further evaluation.</p>2024-10-15T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Ade Dwi Putra, M. Ghufroni An’arshttps://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/article/view/162Kombinasi Metode Rank Sum dan Grey Relational Analysis dalam Pemilihan Pelanggan Terbaik2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00I Wayan Sriyasaiws@unpak.ac.id<p>Selecting the best customers is an important process in marketing and customer relationship management (CRM) strategies that aim to identify the customers who contribute the most to the success of the business. The main problem in selecting the best customer lies in the difficulty in objectively assessing and comparing customer performance, given the diversity of characteristics of each customer. The combination of rank sum and GRA methods is an approach that combines two powerful techniques in multi-attribute decision-making to evaluate and select the best alternatives. This approach aims to overcome the limitations of each method when used separately, and take advantage of the advantages of both methods in producing more objective and accurate decisions. The results of the alternative ranking show that Customer C is ranked first with a value of 0.2, followed by Customer A (0.1865) and Customer G (0.1864). Meanwhile, customers with the lowest GHG values, such as Customer H (0.0167), are in last position because their performance is furthest from ideal conditions. These results help visualize the ranking order based on the performance of each alternative, making it easier to make decisions in choosing the best customers. This research contributes to generating objective and transparent decisions, as well as helping companies identify potential customers based on criteria such as loyalty, revenue contribution, or long-term potential.</p>2024-10-15T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2024 I Wayan Sriyasahttps://ejournal.techcart-press.com/index.php/itsecs/article/view/164Employee Performance Evaluation Using the Standard Method of Deviation Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis2024-12-08T08:51:23+07:00Auliya Rahman Isnainauliyarahman@teknokrat.ac.idYuri Rahmantoyurirahmanto@teknokrat.ac.id<p>Employee performance refers to the extent to which an employee can achieve the goals and expectations that have been set by the organization, both in terms of quantity and quality of work. Employee performance appraisals cover various aspects, such as productivity, skills, discipline, creativity, and the ability to adapt to change. The main problem in employee performance evaluation is often related to the accuracy of assessments of various aspects of performance. Employee performance appraisal is a systematic process to evaluate the extent to which an employee meets the standards set by the organization in carrying out his or her duties and responsibilities. The purpose of this study is to apply the SD-MOORA method in evaluating employee performance objectively and comprehensively in the evaluation process, improve the accuracy of assessment, and provide a clearer picture of employee performance based on relevant criteria. The results of employee performance evaluation using the SD-MOORA method show that Siti Aisyah and Dina Putri occupy the top position with the same preference value, which is 0.47715, which indicates that their performance is superior in meeting the evaluation criteria. Both of these employees demonstrated consistent performance across the various aspects measured. In second place, there is Ahmad Firdaus with a preference score of 0.42932, which also reflects a fairly good contribution, although slightly lower than the two employees in the first rank. These results provide guidance for management to identify the best performing employees as well as design appropriate development strategies for other employees to increase their contributions in the future.</p>2024-10-15T00:00:00+07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Auliya Rahman Isnain, Yuri Rahmanto