Penerapan Metode Grey Relational Analysis dan Rank Order Centroid dalam Pemilihan Travel Agent

Yuri Rahmanto

doi:10.58602/chain.v2i4.149

Yuri Rahmanto Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/chain.v2i4.149

Keywords: Alternative, GRA, Combination, ROC, Election

Abstract

Choosing a travel agent is an important process for individuals or organizations in determining a travel service provider that can meet their needs with the best quality and competitive prices. Choosing a travel agent is a decision that affects the overall travel experience, whether for business or leisure. In this process, potential customers often face challenges in determining the best travel agent among the many options available. In addition, the presence of subjective reviews from other users and promotional ads that highlight certain advantages often add to the complexity of decision-making. In the face of the many options available, it is important to conduct an objective evaluation so that the decision taken is not only about cost, but also about the quality of service and the reputation of the service provider. The purpose of this study is to apply the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Rank Order Centroid (ROC) methods in the process of selecting the best travel agent to provide recommendations for decision-makers in choosing the best travel agent based on the results of a comprehensive analysis, which integrates both weighting and analysis methods. The results of alternative ranking using a combination of ROC and GRA Agent G occupy the highest position with a value of 0.2525, showing the best performance compared to other alternatives. The second and third positions were filled by Agent A and Agent C, with values of 0.2013 and 0.1914, respectively, which also displayed significant performance.

References

H. Lu, Y. Zhao, X. Zhou, and Z. Wei, “Selection of Agricultural Machinery Based on Improved CRITIC-Entropy Weight and GRA-TOPSIS Method,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 266, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/pr10020266.

T. Škrinjarić, “Dynamic portfolio optimization based on grey relational analysis approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 147, p. 113207, 2020.

S. Gao et al., “Optimization of Laser Cladding Parameters for High-Entropy Alloy-Reinforced 316L Stainless-Steel via Grey Relational Analysis,” Coatings, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1103, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/coatings14091103.

P. Citra, I. W. Sriyasa, and H. B. Santoso, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kinerja Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Grey Relational Analysis dan Pembobotan Rank Sum,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–108, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i2.26.

X. Wang et al., “Integration of the grey relational analysis with machine learning for sucrose anaerobic hydrogen production prediction,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 68, pp. 388–397, 2024.

S. Sintaro, “Penerapan Metode Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) Dalam Pemilihan E-Commerce,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 166–173, 2023, doi: 10.58602/itsecs.v1i4.75.

R. Mugiarso, “PENENTUAN PERINGKAT PELANGGAN TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE RANK ORDER CENTROID DAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT (STUDI KASUS ONESNET),” Aisyah J. Informatics Electr. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2023.

A. I. Lubis, P. Sihombing, and E. B. Nababan, “Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology (MECnIT), 2020, pp. 127–131. doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166640.

M. W. Arshad, “Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2330–2341, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i4.1677.

J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and Y. Rahmanto, “Decision Support System for Choosing the Best Shipping Service for E-Commerce Using the SAW and CRITIC Methods,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i2.32.

J. Wang, D. Darwis, S. Setiawansyah, and Y. Rahmanto, “Implementation of MABAC Method and Entropy Weighting in Determining the Best E-Commerce Platform for Online Business,” JiTEKH, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2024, doi: 10.35447/jitekh.v12i2.1000.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.

H. I. Santoso, “Seleksi Penerimaan Programmer Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method (SMART Method) dan Rank Order Centroid,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2024.

B. Zhang et al., “Assessment of the impact of pyrolysis conditions on char reactivity through orthogonal experimental-based grey relational analysis,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 179, p. 106426, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2024.106426.