Rekomendasi Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembobotan PIPRECIA dan Weighted Sum Model

Permata; Aditya Lapu Kalua

doi:10.58602/jaiti.v2i2.127

Permata Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Aditya Lapu Kalua Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v2i2.127

Keywords: Valuation, PIPRECIA, Achievement, Student, WSM

Abstract

Outstanding students are those who stand out in various academic as well as non-academic aspects. They not only have high achievements in terms of grades or exams, but also show dedication and perseverance in pursuing their interests and talents. One of the problems in the selection of outstanding students is the potential for bias and injustice. Non-transparent assessment processes or unclear criteria can lead to inequalities in opportunities for students to be recognized for their achievements. This study aims to develop a recommendation system that can assist schools or educational institutions in identifying and supporting outstanding students effectively, based on a structured and measurable approach using PIPRECIA weighting methods and WSM (Weighted Sum Model). In determining outstanding students, the use of a combination of PIPRECIA and WSM weighting methods can be an effective approach. The first step is to use the PIPRECIA method to establish the relative priorities of various assessment criteria. Once the weight of the criteria is established, WSM is used to assess each student based on the criteria that have been identified. The results of the ranking of outstanding students showed that students on behalf of Yulistio with a WSM score of 50.163 got 1st place, then students on behalf of Annisa with a WSM score of 49.95 got 2nd place, and finally students on behalf of Ferdian with a WSM score of 49.039 got 3rd place.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. D. APRIYANI, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” Fakt. Exacta, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 44, 2021, doi: 10.30998/faktorexacta.v14i1.9057.

A. R. Mahbub, M. Khaerudin, and I. Kharoh, “PENERAPAN METODE SAW (SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING) UNTUK MENENTUKAN SISWA BERPRESTASI (STUDI KASUS PADA SMP NEGERI 24 JAKARTA),” J. Sist. Inf. Univ. SURYADARMA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 193–202, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.35968/jsi.v9i1.854.

I. A. Setyani and Y. R. Sipayung, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi dengan Metode SAW (Simple Addtive Weighting),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 632, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v4i4.6179.

G. Galih, W. Wandi, and H. Herlambang, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SISWA BERPRESTASI BERBASIS WEB DENGAN METODE AHP (ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS),” EDUSAINTEK J. Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 367–378, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.47668/edusaintek.v11i1.946.

F. W. Hutagalung, A. Situmorang, and J. F. Naibaho, “REKOMENDASI BENGKEL SEPEDA MOTOR TERBAIK DIKOTA MEDAN BERDASARKAN SURVEY KEPUASAN PELANGGAN DENGAN METODE WEIGHTED SUM MODEL (WSM) BERBASIS GIS,” Method. J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 34–39, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.46880/mtk.v6i2.407.

Ramadina Pertiwi, Natalia Silalahi, and Fince Tinus Waruwu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Kepala Bengkel Terbaik Menggunakan Metode AHP dan WSM,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v2i1.122.

P. Pesode, S. Barve, S. V Wankhede, D. R. Jadhav, and S. K. Pawar, “Titanium alloy selection for biomedical application using weighted sum model methodology,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 72, pp. 724–728, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.494.

Y. P. Soni and E. Fernandez, “Multi-Criteria Rank-Based Planning of the Distribution System with HOMER Integrated Weighted Sum Model,” in 2022 IEEE 10th Power India International Conference (PIICON), Nov. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/PIICON56320.2022.10045163.

A. Vujji and R. Dahiya, “Real-Time Implementation for Improvement of Weighting Coefficient Selection using Weighted Sum Method for Predictive Torque Control of PMSM Drive,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 6489–6505, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13369-022-07430-z.

M. Saeed, M. Maleki, and H. R. Bahrami, “A Novel Inter-Symbol Interference Model and Weighted Sum Detection for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Systems,” IEEE Trans. Mol. Biol. Multi-Scale Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167–178, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TMBMC.2023.3266578.

N. Jomhari, N. A. Ahmad Alias, A. A. A. Ellah, A. A. Magableh, and E. M. Ghazali, “A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Legacy System Modernization With FUCOM-WSM Approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 48608–48619, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3383917.

Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, and A. A. Aldino, “MCDM Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and PIPRECIA in Customer Loan Eligibility Recommendations,” J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 212–220, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.47065/jieee.v3i2.1628.

D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, G. Popovic, and C. Sava, “Simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) method,” Rom. J. Econ. Forecast., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 141, 2021.

S. Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, V. H. Saputra, and A. A. Aldino, “Combination of Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA-S) in Determining the Best Staff,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 57, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i2.67.

M. W. Arshad, S. Setiawansyah, and S. Sintaro, “Comparative Analysis of the Combination of MOORA and GRA with PIPRECIA Weighting in the Selection of Warehouse Heads,” BEES Bull. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–122, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.47065/bees.v4i3.4922.

I. Đalić, Ž. Stević, C. Karamasa, and A. Puška, “A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 126–145, 2020.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

S. H. Hadad, A. R Metha, S. Setiawansyah, and H. Sulistiani, “Evaluation of Salesperson Performance in the Sales Allowance Decision Support System Using the MARCOS and PIPRECIA Methods,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 477–486, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i2.4863.

A. Blagojević, Ž. Stević, D. Marinković, S. Kasalica, and S. Rajilić, “A Novel Entropy-Fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA Model for Safety Evaluation of Railway Traffic,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1479, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/sym12091479.

L. Ocampo, “Full consistency method (FUCOM) and weighted sum under fuzzy information for evaluating the sustainability of farm tourism sites,” Soft Comput., vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 12481–12508, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07184-8.