Peer Review Process
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI) adopts a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of every published manuscript. In this review model, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process, ensuring an objective, fair, and unbiased assessment.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes editorial screening, plagiarism detection using Turnitin, and independent evaluation by expert reviewers before a final editorial decision is made.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes editorial screening, plagiarism detection using Turnitin, and independent evaluation by expert reviewers before a final editorial decision is made.
Editorial and Peer Review Workflow
Step 1
Initial Editorial Screening
The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for journal scope, formatting, completeness, and plagiarism screening using Turnitin.
The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for journal scope, formatting, completeness, and plagiarism screening using Turnitin.
Step 2
Double-Blind Peer Review
Each manuscript is assigned anonymously to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant research field.
Each manuscript is assigned anonymously to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant research field.
Step 3
Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess originality, methodology, scientific contribution, references, ethics, clarity, and overall manuscript quality.
Reviewers assess originality, methodology, scientific contribution, references, ethics, clarity, and overall manuscript quality.
Step 4
Author Revision
Reviewer comments are sent to the corresponding author. Authors must revise the manuscript and submit a detailed response to reviewers.
Reviewer comments are sent to the corresponding author. Authors must revise the manuscript and submit a detailed response to reviewers.
Step 5
Final Editorial Decision
The Editorial Board evaluates the revised manuscript and determines the final publication decision.
The Editorial Board evaluates the revised manuscript and determines the final publication decision.
Step 6
Publication
Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, proofreading, layout editing, and online publication.
Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, proofreading, layout editing, and online publication.
Editorial Decisions
Accepted
Ready for publication.Minor Revision
Small revisions required.Major Revision
Substantial improvements required.Rejected
Does not meet journal standards.Review Timeline
| Review Stage | Estimated Time |
|---|---|
| Initial Editorial Screening | 1 Week |
| Reviewer Invitation & Acceptance | 1 Week |
| Double-Blind Peer Review | 2–4 Weeks |
| Author Revision | Up to 6 Weeks |
| Final Editorial Decision | 1 Week |
| Production & Online Publication | 1–2 Weeks |
Important Information
- The average review period is approximately 6–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and the quality of manuscript revisions.
- Revised manuscripts should be resubmitted within a maximum of 6 weeks after receiving the revision decision.
- Failure to submit revisions within the specified period may result in withdrawal of the manuscript from the editorial process.
- All accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting and proofreading before publication.
.png){kind=logo}
