Kombinasi Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis Dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Staff Perpustakaan

Agung Deni Wahyudi; Ari Sulistiyawati

doi:10.58602/jaiti.v2i4.136

Agung Deni Wahyudi Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Ari Sulistiyawati Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v2i4.136

Keywords: Combination, OCRA, Election, ROC, Staff

Abstract

Library staff are personnel who work in libraries and are responsible for managing, organizing, and providing various information services to library users. This selection process usually involves several stages, ranging from meeting administrative requirements to assessing the technical and interpersonal abilities of prospective staff. Problems that occur in the selection that do not have clear assessment guidelines can lead to highly subjective assessments, where decisions are influenced more by personal opinion than objective criteria. The purpose of this study is to apply a more objective, structured, and targeted approach to the selection of library staff admissions through a combination of ROC and OCRA methods that produce a selection model that can be applied to various library institutions, as well as support the improvement of service quality and library management through the selection of qualified staff. The results of the evaluation using the OCRA method, the candidate with the highest final score was Candidate H with a score of 0.9133, which placed him in the first rank as the most suitable candidate for the position of library staff. Candidate E was ranked second with a score of 0.8339, showing almost comparable performance and also very competitive. In third place is Candidate B with a final score of 0.3578. The results of this ranking help in identifying the best candidates and show qualitative differences between each prospective staff, supporting the decision-making process in the admission of library staff.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. A. Megawaty, D. Alita, and P. S. Dewi, “PENERAPAN DIGITAL LIBRARY UNTUK OTOMATISASI ADMINISTRASI PERPUSTAKAAN,” J. Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2021.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

E. Rahmayana, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Rank Order Centroid Dalam Analisis Kinerja Pegawai Honorer,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 494–501, 2024.

M. W. Arshad, “Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2330–2341, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i4.1677.

J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and Y. Rahmanto, “Decision Support System for Choosing the Best Shipping Service for E-Commerce Using the SAW and CRITIC Methods,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i2.32.

F. S. Amalia, “Pemilihan Hotel Terbaik Berdasarkan Review Pengguna Menggunakan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA),” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2024.

A. Ulutaş, G. Popovic, D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on a Novel Grey PIPRECIA and Grey OCRA Methods,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1698, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/math8101698.

A. Karim, S. Esabella, K. Kusmanto, M. Mesran, and U. Hasanah, “Analisa Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) dan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Calon Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1674–1687, 2021.

R. Lukic and B. H. Zekic, “Evaluation of transportation and storage efficiency in Serbia based on ratio analysis and the OCRA method,” Bus. Logist. Mod. Manag., vol. 21, pp. 189–200, 2021.

M. N. D. Satria, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Staff Administrasi Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2023.

Z. H. Ramadhani, N. A. Hasibuan, and D. P. Utomo, “Implementasi Metode MOORA Dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Staff Gudang PT. Royal Abadi Sejahtera,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 581–587, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2073.

W. I. Safitri, M. Mesran, and S. Sarwandi, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Penerimaan Staff IT,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, May 2022, doi: 10.61944/bids.v1i1.1.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.

A. Pramuditya, D. Darwis, and S. Setiawansyah, “Kombinasi Logarithmic Percentage Change-Driven Objective Weighting dan Complex Proportional Assessment Dalam Penentuan Supplier Perlengkapan Olahraga,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 660–669, 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i3.5160.

M. W. Arshad, S. Setiawansyah, and S. Sintaro, “Comparative Analysis of the Combination of MOORA and GRA with PIPRECIA Weighting in the Selection of Warehouse Heads,” BEES Bull. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–122, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.47065/bees.v4i3.4922.