Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Supplier dengan Metode TOPSIS

  • Rakhmat Dedi Gunawan Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Keywords: Decision, Criterion, Election, Supplier, TOPSIS

Abstract

Supplier selection is an important process in supply chain management that aims to select the best business partners who are able to provide goods or services according to the company's needs with optimal quality, price, and delivery time. Problems in selecting suppliers often arise due to the complexity of the evaluation process involving various conflicting criteria. The main purpose of this study is to produce a more accurate and objective supplier ranking based on various criteria, such as product quality, price, delivery time, order flexibility, and payment terms. With this approach, this research can improve decision-making efficiency by minimizing subjectivity and bias in the supplier evaluation process. This research contributes to the development of a decision support system based on a multi-criteria method, especially in the context of supply chain management and business partner selection. The results of the calculation using the TOPSIS method, the alternative ranking for supplier selection is determined by the proximity value calculated from the distance of each alternative to the positive and negative ideal solution. Supplier 7 ranked first with the highest proximity value, 0.7653, indicating that this supplier is closest to the ideal solution. It was followed by Supplier 3 in second place with a proximity value of 0.7112, which also had a good performance although slightly lower than Supplier 7. The results of this ranking provide a clear picture of which suppliers best meet the desired criteria, making it easier to make decisions.

References

Faisal Amir, Pressa Persana Surya Saputra, Jasmir, Samsul Lutfi, Ni Luh Wiwik Sri Rahayu Ginantra, and Ilham Tri Maulana, “Penerapan Metode Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS) dalam Pemilihan Supplier,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–23, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.47065/jimat.v3i1.241.

W. T. Nugroho, S. Supriatin, F. Asharudin, and O. Arifin, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER PAKAIAN DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING PADA TOKO HENHEN COLLECTION,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 6, no. 01 SE-, pp. 1–10, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.24076/infosjournal.2023v6i01.1011.

R. P. Rizqika and E. Zuraidah, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Dengan Metode Analythical Hierarchy Process Pada PT. Konten Indomedia Pratama,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 161–171, 2022.

J. Wang, D. Darwis, S. Setiawansyah, and Y. Rahmanto, “Implementation of MABAC Method and Entropy Weighting in Determining the Best E-Commerce Platform for Online Business,” JiTEKH, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2024, doi: 10.35447/jitekh.v12i2.1000.

D. A. Prameswari and A. Hadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada Diskominfo Di Kabupaten Nganjuk Berbasis Web,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Asia, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 147, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.32815/jitika.v17i2.931.

M. P. Basílio, V. Pereira, H. G. Costa, M. Santos, and A. Ghosh, “A Systematic Review of the Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methods (1977–2022),” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1720, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11111720.

M. Narang, A. Kumar, and R. Dhawan, “A fuzzy extension of MEREC method using parabolic measure and its applications,” J. Decis. Anal. Intell. Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–46, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31181/jdaic10020042023n.

D. D. Trung, “Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process,” J. Mach. Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 57–71, 2021.

C. Z. Radulescu and M. Radulescu, “A Hybrid Group Multi-Criteria Approach Based on SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and COPRAS Methods for Complex IoT Selection Problems,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 789, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13040789.

G. R. Putra, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Smartphone Gaming Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2022, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i1.5.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium Menggunakan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, 2023.

D. Darwis, H. Sulistiani, D. A. Megawaty, S. Setiawansyah, and I. Agustina, “Implementation of EDAS Method in the Selection of the Best Students with ROC Weighting,” Komputasi J. Ilm. Ilmu Komput. dan Mat., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 112–125, 2023, doi: 10.33751/komputasi.v20i2.7904.

W. Saputra, S. A. Wardana, H. Wahyuda, and D. A. Megawaty, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Sum Dalam Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2024.

Y. S. Bagi, S. Suyono, and M. F. Tomatala, “Decision Support System for High Achieving Students Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS,” in 2020 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICORIS50180.2020.9320823.

R. Hasanzadeh, P. Mojaver, T. Azdast, S. Khalilarya, A. Chitsaz, and M. A. Rosen, “Decision analysis for plastic waste gasification considering energy, exergy, and environmental criteria using TOPSIS and grey relational analysis,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 174, pp. 414–423, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.04.028.

Published
2024-07-21
How to Cite
Gunawan, R. D. (2024). Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Supplier dengan Metode TOPSIS. Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science, 2(3), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.58602/itsecs.v2i3.157