Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Kinerja Koperasi Terbaik Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method

Ahmad Bustomi

doi:10.58602/itsecs.v1i4.72

Ahmad Bustomi Universitas Bina Darma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/itsecs.v1i4.72

Abstract

Assessing the best cooperative involves several factors involving sustainability, operational success, and positive impact on its members. Cooperatives that are considered the best usually have transparent and accountable management, offer relevant and quality services and products, and have a high level of participation from their members. This study aims to apply the SMART Method in the recommendation system for selecting the best cooperatives in the XYZ Cooperative and MSME Office so that the Office gets a recommendation for selecting the best cooperative based on the SMART method. The ranking results of the table above show that the 1st rank of the best cooperative performance was obtained with a final value of 0.61 by Cooperative D, the 2nd rank of the best cooperative performance was obtained with a final value of 0.585 by Cooperative F, the 3rd rank of the best cooperative performance was obtained with a final value of 0.44 by Cooperative G.

References

S. Setiawansyah, A. Surahman, A. T. Priandika, and S. Sintaro, Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan pada Sistem Informasi. Bandar Lampung: CV Keranjang Teknologi Media, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://buku.techcartpress.com/detailebook?id=1/penerapan-sistem-pendukung-keputusan-pada-sistem-informasi/setiawansyah-ade-surahman-adhie-thyo-priandika-sanriomi-sintaro

D. C. Panjaitan, H. Juliansa, and R. Yanto, “Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Wp Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Kasus Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Bin. STMIK Bina Nusant. Jaya Lubuklinggau, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2021.

B. Aprilia and A. H. Azhar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kepala Gudang Pada PT. Charoen Pokphand Medan Menggunakan Metode SMART,” Inf. Syst. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2022.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

G. R. Putra, “Penerapan Metode ELECTRE Dalam Penentuan Pemilihan Kartu Smartphone,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2022.

R. R. Oprasto, “Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Raw Material Supplier Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Method Technique,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.12.

A. R. Isnain, “Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Simple Ration Analysis Dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.14.

W. M. Ardana, I. R. Wulandari, Y. Astuti, L. D. Farida, and W. Widayani, “Implementasi Metode SMART (Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Pinjaman,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1756–1766, 2022.

S. Sunarti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Promosi Jabatan dengan Metode SMART (Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique),” JOINS (Journal Inf. Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 192–199, 2020.

S. Ahdan and S. Setiawansyah, “Android-Based Geolocation Technology on a Blood Donation System (BDS) Using the Dijkstra Algorithm,” IJAIT (International J. Appl. Inf. Technol., pp. 1–15, 2021.

D. Mahendra and A. T. P. Setiawansyah, “PERANCANGAN DAN IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM INVENTARIS BARANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEB ENGINEERING (STUDI KASUS: SMK TRISAKTI JAYA BANDAR LAMPUNG),” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 33–37, 2022, doi: 10.33365/jtsi.v3i2.1692.

L. Fatmawati, A. T. Priandika, and A. D. Putra, “Application of Website-Based Fieldwork Practice Information System,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.58602/itsecs.v1i1.2.