Kombinasi Metode MEREC dan TOPSIS dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Calon Karyawan Baru

Ilham Nasul Fathon  Muhaji. P; Adhie Thyo Priandika

doi:10.58602/jaiti.v4i3.254

Ilham Nasul Fathon Muhaji. P ^{(Corresponding Author)} Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
Adhie Thyo Priandika Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v4i3.254

Keywords: Decision Support System, MEREC, TOPSIS, Employee Selection, Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

The employee candidate selection process in many companies is still often carried out manually, resulting in decision-making that is subjective, inconsistent, and ineffective, especially when having to evaluate many applicants based on various criteria simultaneously. This situation makes it difficult for companies to determine the best candidate objectively and accurately. Therefore, this study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) in the selection of new employee candidates by combining the MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods. The MEREC method is used to determine the weight of criteria objectively based on the influence of each criterion on the change in alternative performance, while the TOPSIS method is used to rank prospective employees based on their closeness to the positive ideal solution and their distance from the negative ideal solution. The criteria used in this study include education, work experience, technical skills, communication, and age. The results of the study indicate that the proposed method combination is able to produce a more objective, systematic, and accurate employee selection process. Based on the ranking results, alternative A7-IP obtained the highest preference value of 0.9945 and ranked first, followed by A5-EK with a value of 0.9427 in second place, and A1-AR with a value of 0.8946 in third place. The application of the MEREC and TOPSIS methods also successfully increased consistency and reduced subjectivity in the employee selection decision-making process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Iqbal and R. Juliansyah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Karyawan Rumah Sakit Bmc Dengan Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” J. TIKA, vol. 8, no. 1, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.51179/tika.v8i1.1936.

BENADIA LATIFAH and PUTRI AISYIYAH RAKHMA DEVI, “SELEKSI KARYAWAN OUTSOURCING MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY DENGAN PEMBOBOTAN RANK ORDER CENTROID,” J. INSTEK (Informatika Sains dan Teknol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 238–247, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.24252/instek.v7i2.31656.

N. Ariati, S. Suryati, and M. A. Ikram, “Optimalisasi Pemilihan Pelanggan Utama Berbasis Web Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1 SE-, pp. 369–378, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v5i1.1764.

A. F. Pasaribu, A. Surahman, A. T. Priandika, S. Sintaro, and Y. T. Utami, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Guru Menggunakan SAW,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–19, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.21.

S. Dündar, “Prioritizing the Regional Preferences of Turkish Investors Regarding Foreign Direct Investment by ARLON Method,” Konya J. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 927–946, 2025, doi: 10.36306/konjes.1648279.

K. Zorlu, M. Tuncer, and A. Yılmaz, “Assessment of Resources for Geotourism Development: Integrated SWARA-COBRA Approach Under Spherical Fuzzy Environments,” Geoheritage, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 89, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12371-024-00993-3.

D. Tešić, D. Božanić, S. P. Mondal, and A. Puška, “Modification of the Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC) Method and Improvement with Fermatean Fuzzy numbers,” J. Soft Comput. Decis. Anal., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 146–157, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.31181/jscda31202570.

P. Liu, T. Zhang, F. Tian, Y. Teng, and M. Yang, “Optimized Grid Partitioning and Scheduling in Multi-Energy Systems Using a Hybrid Decision-Making Approach,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 13. 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17133253.

S. M. Shaaban and Y. I. Mesalam, “SVC Parameters Optimization Using a Novel Integrated MCDM Approach,” Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 4. 2022. doi: 10.3390/sym14040702.

B. S. Mahapatra, D. Ghosh, D. Pamucar, and G. S. Mahapatra, “Dynamic group decision-making for enterprise resource planning selection using two-tuples Pythagorean fuzzy MOORA approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 263, p. 125675, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125675.

A. Setiyono, M. A. Hariyadi, and S. Harini, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja guru berbasis multi-criteria decision making,” Wiyata Dharma J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 11, no. 2 SE-Artikel, pp. 107–117, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.30738/wd.v11i2.15871.

S. Setiawansyah, “IT Personnel Recruitment Decision Support System: Combination of TOPSIS and Entropy Weighting Methods,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 3 SE-Articles, pp. 118–130, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v2i3.131.

Rizalina, “Model Analisis Rekrutmen Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. KomtekInfo, vol. 9, pp. 74–79, 2022, doi: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v9i2.268.

R. Duri and T. Kristiana, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Dengan SAW Untuk Seleksi Karyawan Terbaik,” J. Sci. Appl. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 118–123, 2022, doi: 10.36085/jsai.v5i2.3427.

M. Minarwati, M. Muzakkar, and R. A. Fitri, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Profile Matching Untuk Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan,” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 204–213, 2024, doi: 10.24076/joism.2024v5i2.1419.

J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and S. Sumanto, “Comparison of Objective Weighting Methods in SAW and Their Effect on Alternative Ranking Results,” J. Masy. Inform., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 89–112, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.14710/jmasif.17.1.78414.

S. Setiawansyah, J. Wang, and P. Palupiningsih, “Integration of G2M Weighting and MOORA in Accurate Decision Making for Best Alternative Selection,” J. CoreIT J. Has. Penelit. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 111–123.

J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, T. Ardiansah, F. Ulum, and S. Sumanto, “Decision Support System for Determining Strategic Warehouse Locations Using a Combination of the WENSLO Weighting and RAWEC Method,” JUTI J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf., vol. 24, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 165–184, 2026, doi: 10.12962/j24068535.v24i1.a1456.

N. T. D. Linh, N. H. Son, and D. X. Thao, “Evaluating the Impact of Weighting Methods on the Stability of Scores for Alternatives in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 1 SE-, pp. 19998–20004, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.9518.

M. Mohamed, A. Salam, J. Ye, and R. Yong, “Single-Valued Neutrosophic MCDM Approaches Integrated with MEREC and RAM for the Selection of UAVs in Forest Fire Detection and Management,” Neutrosophic Syst. with Appl., vol. 19 SE-R, pp. 1–14, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.61356/j.nswa.2024.19319.

A. Puška, D. Božanić, Z. Mastilo, and D. Pamučar, “Extension of MEREC-CRADIS methods with double normalization-case study selection of electric cars,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 7097–7113, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08054-7.

R. Kumar, “A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends,” Decis. Mak. Adv., vol. 3, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 185–199, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.31181/dma31202569.

E. H. Özder, “A Sustainable Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Online Grocery Distribution Hub Location Selection,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 6. 2025. doi: 10.3390/pr13061653.